Blog: Whiplash, discount rate, Vnuk and driverless cars on the road ahead

car-on-road

  • The whiplash reform will cap payouts and ban pre-medical offers but won’t stop CMCs from operating inappropriately
  • The new discount rate inflates the cost of claims
  • The Vnuk ruling could push up the MIB levy
  • Autonomous vehicles will reduce accidents but introduce new risks

The Association of British Insurers’ announcement that motor insurance premiums hit their highest recorded levels at the end of last year is another reminder that change is long overdue in the personal motor market. That’s coming but will it be enough?

First up is the Prisons and Courts Bill, which seeks to bring premiums down by around £40 a year by tackling the whiplash epidemic. This will see a ban on claims without medical evidence, an increase in the small claims track from £1000 to £5000 for road traffic accidents, and new fixed tariffs to cap whiplash payouts. Frequency of whiplash claims will be unaffected but on the face of it, subject to the emergence of new business models or displacement, the cost will be reduced for insurers.

Unfortunately, the reforms don’t really go far enough. The provision for a 20% uplift on undefined ‘exceptional’ claims will drive inappropriate behaviours while the tariff scale will enable claimant firms to carve out profit from these claims through conditional fee agreements. 

Any positive shift on claims costs provided by the whiplash reform is overshadowed by the change to the discount rate. By slashing the rate from 2.5% to minus 0.75%, PWC has estimated that the additional cost to policyholders will range from £75 for the average motor consumer to £1000 for higher risk drivers.

Insurers gained some reassurance, with the acknowledgement by the HM Treasury that the discount rate should be set at a level that is fair to consumers as well as personal injury claimants. We now await the outcome of the consultation to see whether this balance will be struck. 

Further change comes as a result of the Vnuk ruling. Although the European Union is currently considering how this will be factored into the Motor Insurance Directive, the Motor Insurers’ Bureau could find itself having to compensate victims of accidents involving vehicles not currently covered by motor insurance. This could potentially push up the MIB levy, with implications for motor premiums. 

Even greater change is on the horizon with the arrival of autonomous vehicles. Keen to support this new type of technology, Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond committed £390m of funding in his Autumn Statement to boost the development of low carbon and autonomous vehicles.

Certainly, autonomous vehicles represent a positive step for motorists and insurers. Removing human error from the UK’s roads will significantly reduce road traffic accidents. However, new risks will emerge for insurers as the technology evolves and when there is a mixture of autonomous and driver-controlled vehicles on our roads.

If an accident happens due to a defect with the autonomous technology, the motor insurer will, in the first instance, deal with any claims – including potentially any injury claims from the driver of the vehicle. It’s uncertain how manufacturers will respond when insurers chase them for compensation, especially when they will hold all the vehicle data.

There’s also the scope for new types of fraud to emerge: without access to data, what’s to stop the driver saying their vehicle was in autonomous mode when it crashed, causing them injury, when they were actually in control and just took their eye off the road? Resolving these issues will clearly be essential.

The motor insurance industry is facing the most significant period of change in its history. With that comes uncertainty but also the potential for some extremely positive outcomes for motorists and insurers. Fewer accidents and curbs on the UK’s compensation culture are worthy destinations.

To reach these, we must keep our focus on the consumer, whatever challenges are presented. Mobility is essential for the UK’s economy; ensuring motor insurance is affordable and fair is a must. That means managing claims frequency and cost.

In a highly competitive market, insurers will do all they can but, ultimately, effective and balanced government intervention is needed to address some significant societal issues. The motor insurance consumer should ask themselves whether that has been delivered so far.

Motor Insurance World 2017

Following a fantastic launch, we are delighted to announce the return of Motor Insurance World for 2017.

Last year saw 35+ speakers from insurers, driverless car leaders and motor manufacturers, plus the Under Secretary of State from the Department for Transport.

Book your place today and discover the most critical issues to address at each stage of disruption, to develop strategies to thrive today and tomorrow, and to deliver the insurance that the customer of tomorrow wants.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

How to support insurance customers in vulnerable circumstances

As the Financial Conduct Authority intends to check claims-handling response times, and whether insurers are doing enough to help customers in vulnerable circumstances, Winn Group chief information officer Clint Milnes explains what providers need to do to meet the watchdog’s expectations.

How insurers should navigate supply chain disruption

With supply chain disruption continuing, Bill Bradshaw, operations senior vice president for London operations at FM Global­, says companies need to prioritise resilience and proactive prevention measures beyond insurance reliance.

Could rugby court clash shift the sport to self-insuring?

The outcome of a lawsuit launched by hundreds of rugby union players could have a far-reaching impact on the future of the sport. Tim Evershed looks at whether parallels can be drawn with similar actions in the US against governing bodies, such as the NFL and NHL, and what can be done to make sure players remain insurable.

Using AI to monitor claim health

Wayne Calderbank, group data and performance director at Claims Consortium Group, says artificial intelligence is enabling the monitoring of sentiment within the claims journey and ensuring potential problems can be identified and addressed.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here