Skip to main content

Blog: Aon’s plan to slash pay, preserve dividend leaves a sour taste

greg-case-speech-2

Aon will cut the pay of 70% of its staff and slice executive pay packets as it seeks to preserve jobs during the coronavirus pandemic, but the broking giant’s decision to go ahead with a May dividend payment seems at odds with its message.

In a letter to employees, Aon CEO Greg Case, pictured, described the “gravity of this crisis” and the “trauma” the Covid-19 pandemic has brought.

“We also acknowledge that we are experiencing a humanitarian tragedy at a scale that is difficult to comprehend. While we hold on to glimmers of hope that the worst of the human impact may have passed, the economic consequences are likely to play out for months, or even years to come. Which presents us with difficult decisions in the near term,” Case continued.

Case went on to reel off a raft of temporary changes. But before doing so, he said: “Paying a regular dividend is consistent with maintaining an investment grade rating and fundamental to accessing the capital markets.”

As part of the changes, the broker revealed that roughly 30% of staff will retain their full salaries, with seven in ten (70%) set to take a 20% pay cut.

Executives at the broker – including himself, Christa Davies, Eric Andersen, John Bruno, Tony Goland and the board of directors – will take a 50% pay cut.

The broker has “significantly” curtailed spending on contractors and third-party vendors, Case continued, and its business services teams is “mobilising a monumental firm-wide effort” to reduce any discretionary spend that is not related to client service. In addition, it has pushed pause on a planned stock buyback.

Case also confirmed the broker’s commitment to the acquisition of Willis Towers Watson, which will see it eclipse Marsh as the largest global firm in a deal worth $29.9bn (£24.1bn). Covid-19 redundancies may not be forthcoming, but staff are staring down the barrel of the WTW mega-merger and asking what this means for them further down the line.

Case continued: “Our objective is that everyone emerges from this challenging period in as good a place as possible; unfortunately, it is too early in this economic crisis to determine how we ultimately mitigate these actions.”

“We are going on offense to both protect our firm and prepare for the opportunity that lays ahead. Because as much as these actions reflect a principled decision consistent with our values, it is also a business decision based squarely on client need. We are witnessing a global shift in client priorities not seen in recent history and we must be ready to answer that call,” he added.

Against this backdrop, with staff pay cuts and, as Case put it, the global economy facing “the worst performance in nearly 100 years” it seems strange – one might say ill thought through – that Aon has not put pay to its 44 cent quarterly dividend in May.

In the UK alone, the Financial Times has reported that there could be £52bn put aside in shelved dividend pay outs. Within the insurance sector we’ve seen non-motor heavy insurers facing up to regulator calls to hold off on shareholder payouts for now.

Aon would be far from the odd one out if it held off on a dividend payout in solidarity with its people. Shareholders may not thank it, but surely they could understand it.

Has the broking giant missed its own memo?

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

Curious case of Aon’s co-CEOs as Page and Kielty exit

Content Director’s View: The appointment of co-CEOs at Aon following Jane Kielty and Julie Page stepping down reignited a familiar debate – is joint leadership ever a good idea? Jonathan Swift examines whether the sceptical reaction was justified.

Q&A: Massimo Cavadini and Pardeep Bassi, WTW

Massimo Cavadini, head of product, pricing, claims and underwriting for Continental Europe at WTW, and Pardeep Bassi, global proposition leader for data science, insurance consulting and technology at WTW, delve into the 2025 European Insurance & Occupational Pensions Authority’s Generative AI Market Survey and whether a rewrite of the rules of insurance analytics is required.

Fair value rules still fail brokers and consumers alike

Four-and-a-half years after the Financial Conduct Authority’s fair value rules arrived, Branko Bjelobaba, principal of compliance consultancy Branko Ltd, argues inconsistent data and vague metrics still make it difficult for brokers and consumers to compare insurance products properly.

Climate change puts brokers centre stage

With floods, heatwaves and subsidence rewriting the rules of risk, Caroline Elliott-Grey, senior product manager for UK and Ireland at LexisNexis Risk Solutions, argues brokers who harness property-level insights can build trust, protect clients and prove their value in a volatile market.

Could the Gallagher and PIB deal be back on?

Deputy Editor’s View: Whispers at the British Insurance Brokers' Association conference earlier this month suggest Gallagher could be willing to buy PIB again, less than a year after plug was pulled on a deal and the latter refinanced.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here