Voice of dissent.

Lord Justice Waller disagreed with the majority view in a recent credit insurance case before the Court of Appeal. John Butler looks at both the views of the dissenting judge and the majority verdict.

Article 13(1) of a direct credit insurance policy came under scrutiny
in the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Kazakstan Wool Processors
(Europe) Ltd v Nederlan-dsche Credietverzekering

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Post? View our subscription options

Register

Want to know what’s included in our free registration? Click here

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here