Skip to main content

Defendant knowledge crucial in PI claims

Cressey v E Timm and Son and E Timm and Son Holding (Court of Appeal - 24 June 2005)

Mr Cressey sustained an injury at work in December 2000. He pursued E Timm and Son, which he identified as his employer because it was named on his payslips.

In 2001, he received a response from Zurich

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Post? View our subscription options

FCA and PRA turn spotlight on MGA oversight

The Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority are sharpening their scrutiny of managing general agents, stressing insurers must take primary responsibility for businesses underwriting on their behalf.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here