Skip to main content

Lost clause?

The case of AIG v Faraday demonstrates that not all claims co-operation clauses may achieve the purpose intended of them by reinsurers, so getting the wording right first time around is essential, warn Andrew Rose and Neil Owen

AIG v Faraday concerned the operation of a commonly occurring claims co-operation clause in the reinsurance market. Adherence to the terms of the clause was expressed to operate as a condition

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Post? View our subscription options

FCA and PRA turn spotlight on MGA oversight

The Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority are sharpening their scrutiny of managing general agents, stressing insurers must take primary responsibility for businesses underwriting on their behalf.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here