Advice has a risk.
John Butler follows up last month's analysis of the House of Lords ruling in Aneco v Johnson & Higgins with a look at what the decision means in general for a broker's duty of care.
View the pdf of this story
On one level, the lesson to be learnt from Aneco Re Underwriting Ltd v Johnson & Higgins Ltd, (2001) UKHL 51, about determining a reinsurance broker's liability for
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@postonline.co.uk
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@postonline.co.uk
Most read
- British Insurance Awards 2024 shortlist revealed
- British Insurance Technology Awards shortlist 2024 announced
- ‘Common sense prevails’ as Supreme Court rejects insurer mixed injury appeals