Skip to main content

European investors see Solvency II hurting corporate debt

moneyminimummaximum

Half of investors expect Solvency II to have a negative impact on the demand for corporate debt, a survey has found.

Fitch Ratings' latest quarterly European fixed income investor survey, spoke to managers of an estimated $4trn of fixed income assets.

"Nearly half of respondents (46%) expect the consequences of forthcoming insurance regulatory changes on the demand for long-term fixed income assets issued by corporates to be negative," said Monica Insoll, managing director in Fitch's credit market research group. "A similar proportion (42%) thought there would be no real impact and 12% believed Solvency II would be a positive for the asset class."

The response was broadly similar to that received in the Q310 survey, when 44% of respondents said corporates would be negatively affected. Solvency II, a new regulatory framework for European insurers, is due to come into force on 1 January 2013.

In the Q211 survey, respondents were also asked about the impact on sovereign debt. On this topic, investors were more optimistic. Responses were evenly split, with 28% anticipating positive and negative impacts respectively.

"Solvency II brings in explicit capital charges on assets for all European insurers for the first time," said Clara Hughes, director in Fitch's EMEA insurance rating team. "European Economic Area sovereign debt is currently proposed as one of the few asset classes to be exempt from direct charges."

"The regulations will require insurers to consider short-term risk in the form of a one year value at risk. This is a completely new perspective for many insurers that have been accustomed to a buy and hold philosophy," added Aymeric Poizot, head of Fitch's EMEA fund and asset manager rating group. "For example, from a Solvency II standpoint, high grade long-term corporate credit is no longer a low risk carry investment and could be less favoured. Consequently products providing long-term guarantees that were profitable under Solvency I may no longer be viable under Solvency II."

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

Why can’t the FCA see and act on the full claims picture?

Editor’s View: Emma Ann Hughes argues the Financial Conduct Authority can either continue to defend its frameworks after Which?’s super-complaint or accept that collecting data is meaningless unless it triggers earlier, tougher and more visible intervention against providers that repeatedly fail policyholders.

Four biggest challenges facing insurers in 2026 revealed

Insurance Post reveals the four main challenges general insurers face in 2026 and the solutions experts from EY, the International Underwriting Association, AM Best, Moody’s, S&P, KPMG, Pathlight Associates and Sicsic Advisory say will matter most in the year ahead.

Axa Partners hit with FCA limitations

Following the Which? super complaint, the Financial Conduct Authority has told Axa Partners UK it cannot grow its current customer base without written permission from the regulator.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here