Skip to main content

CNA Hardy's Dave Brosnan on bumps in the road as businesses go global

Dave Brosnan, CEO, CNA Hardy Europe

  • Companies are turning to Europe and Asia to grow their top line
  • Corporate, compliance and supply chain risks are much more likely to trip these companies up than macro political and economic risks
  • As businesses are held to higher standards of governance, the risk increases for individual directors to be held criminally responsible for corporate failures

Brexit and terrorism may grab headlines, but boards shouldn't turn their attention away from corporate, compliance and supply chain risks, which are more likely to thwart their international ambitions, warns Dave Brosnan, CEO of CNA Hardy Europe.

As American business magnate Warren Buffet once said: “In the business world, the rear-view mirror is always clearer than the windshield.” 

To help CNA clear the windscreen, we undertake a biannual Risk and Confidence Survey with 450 UK-based multinational businesses across nine different sectors to assess business confidence and understand C-Suite risk concerns both now and in six months’ time. 

Far from clearing the windscreen however, our latest research revealed some disturbing findings.

A toxic mix of worries over the Brexit negotiations, terror attacks and the UK’s shock election result hit confidence levels hard during 2017. As a consequence, companies reported they are turning outward for growth, relying less on domestic opportunities in favour of Europe, and to an extent Asia, to grow the top line.

As companies switch focus away from the UK, however, the research shows their attention is caught by headline-grabbing political and economic risks to the detriment of a trio of boardroom risks – corporate, compliance and supply chain. In our view, these three boardroom risks are much more likely to trip companies up as they go global for growth than macro political and economic risks, which they can do little to mitigate.

Expanding business internationally exposes firms to unfamiliar regulatory scrutiny, particularly in Europe, where directors carry greater personal responsibility for corporate acts and have less protection. Yet only 8% of C-suite leaders surveyed were worried about corporate threats – for example the risk of fraud, corruption, poor governance and pensions exposure. The same low proportion (8%) were worried about compliance risk, which includes new or growing regulatory exposures, both in the UK and internationally.

Perhaps more worryingly, only 6% of business leaders ranked supply chain as an area of concern. Longer and more complex supply chains increase exposure to a web of third parties in Europe and Asia, making operations more complex and driving up risk. In addition, there will be increased compliance exposures when operating in new business environments with differing business practices.

With British businesses confident that their future success lies in international development, it is concerning that the more mundane boardroom risks appear to be dropping off their risk agenda, hampering their ability to realise their growth ambitions.

Lookig ahead, the regulatory climate is only set to get tougher as businesses are held to increasingly higher standards of governance. This will increase the risk of individual directors being held criminally responsible for broader systemic corporate failures in areas including everything from data protection through to human slavery, corporate manslaughter and bribery.

The marked rise in litigation in these areas – think Morrisons’ data privacy case and the rash of Deferred Prosecution Agreements by the likes of Tesco and Rolls Royce in 2017 – is just the first indication of the kind of heavy weather companies can expect as they look through the windscreen. Put simply, it’s perturbing that these boardroom risk blind spots are putting directors at immediate and significant personal risk.

Armed with this insight, insurers need to work with our regional, London and international brokers to shine a light on the likely road ahead. As an insurance community, we should make it our mission to ensure that this trio of fundamental boardroom risks does not crash companies’ plans as they look overseas to preserve the topline. 

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

FCA vows to keep pressure on premium finance APRs

The Financial Conduct Authority has said it will “continue to put pressure” on companies offering premium finance in a bid to continue lowering annual percentage rates after revealing the impact its enforcement action has had so far.

FCA’s Knight insists CPD changes are not a relaxation

The Financial Conduct Authority’s decision to ditch its 15-hour-per-year continuing professional development requirement for insurers should not be viewed as a relaxation of standards, according to the regulator’s director of insurance, Chris Knight.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here