Skip to main content

Ruling “sting in the tail” for insureds

legal-tribunals

Michael Frisby, partner in the dispute resolution team at law firm Stevens & Bolton has commented on a test case which has opened up the possibility of legal expenses policyholders choosing their own solicitors.

Yesterday Post reported that the High Court had given judgment in Webster Dixon v Equity Syndicate concerning the industry-wide practice of legal expenses insurers refusing to pay for non-panel

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Post? View our subscription options

FCA looking to address issues on claims definitions

Andrew Ruddle, the Financial Conduct Authority’s interim head of the department for insurance market analysis and policy, has said the regulator is looking at addressing issues about different claims definitions within insurance.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here