Skip to main content

Directors confused by scattered compliance

The necessity for legislative and regulatory compliance is uppermost in the minds of all IT director...

The necessity for legislative and regulatory compliance is uppermost in the minds of all IT directors and finance directors, since the financial mismanagement of projects could leave senior management legally exposed.

However, the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley, Basel II, and the new regulations from the Financial Services Authority could result in another 'Y2K' for IT users. Millions of pounds are being spent on systems projects to tighten up and secure financial controls and formalise document and information management.

Moreover, deadlines for compliance are randomly scattered throughout the coming months, like underwater mines waiting to catch the unwary.

Navigating a way through to a safe haven calls for far more than just applying basic project management skillsets and techniques.

Companies need to ask three fundamental questions before throwing money at a compliance project. Firstly, do they have the right tools and management practices in place to scope the project, and define its deliverables and the desired measures of success?

Secondly, do they have systems in place that can accurately capture and record all the time and resources spent on this preparation, as well as on the multi-faceted actions that must follow?

And last, but not least, are they able to collate and deliver all this information in a clear and concise manner so that it is transparently visible to all stakeholders?

Without this approach, companies will waste significant time and money on projects that have a low probability of completion on time and within budget, and that expose senior management to court action.

Tony Hurst, Head of sales, Sharp OWL.

Letters can be sent to: The Editor, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, by fax on: 020 7484 9988, or by e-mail to: jonathan.swift@incisivemedia.com.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

Storm damage claims test insurers’ settlement choices

A year of severe storms has strained repair networks and claims operations, which Ben Blain, head of property at Verisk Claims, points out has placed insurers’ settlement decisions, data oversight and ability to evidence fair customer outcomes firmly under the regulatory spotlight.

How should success of FCA’s response to Which be judged?

The effectiveness of the Financial Conduct Authority’s regulatory action in response to Which’s super-complaint about home and travel insurance is reflected in smoother claims handling, not in the number of reviews or fines, according to Claire Massey, founder of Claim Guardians.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here