Skip to main content

Court ruling puts focus on D&O risks of board secrecy

Sam Cornelius

The Supreme Court’s Saxon Woods ruling highlights how covert boardroom dissent can translate into personal directors and officers (D&O) insurance exposure, according to Sam Cornelius, lead management liability underwriter at Rrelentless.

What happens when directors disagree on strategy, but one acts privately, without full board transparency? 

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Saxon Woods Investments Ltd v Costa [2026] serves as a reminder

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Post? View our subscription options

Is aviation insurance entering a new era of risk?

How aviation insurers are navigating a rapidly changing risk landscape, from increasingly complex aircraft technology and composite materials to geopolitical conflict and cyber threats, is explored in the latest Insurance Post Podcast.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here