Swift v Carpenter: Change needed if costs formula 'no longer fits' purpose, says Personal Injuries Bar Association
If the current formula for calculating serious injury accommodation costs is no longer fit for purpose then it should be improved, the Personal Injuries Bar Association's representative said on the third and final day of the Swift v Carpenter appeal.
Swift v Carpenter (2018) relates to a road traffic accident in October 2013 in which Swift sustained serious leg injuries leading to a below-knee amputation. Swift was awarded more than £4m in damages
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@postonline.co.uk
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@postonline.co.uk
More on Claims
What is truly behind the uptick in travel insurance complaints?
Editor’s View: Emma Ann Hughes argues travel insurers who try to claim 99.993% of holidaymakers are happy with their products and services should reconsider the way they look at customer complaints.
Claims ‘hell’ with Policy Expert causes mother to set up group
A mother-of-two, who has been through a 17-month battle with Policy Expert following a fire at her home, has set up an action group to help “other families going through hell with claims.”
Q&A: James Eveling, Woodgate & Clark
James Eveling, managing director of loss adjuster Woodgate & Clark, addresses the war for talent and discusses the firm’s growth plans plus its new claims system.
Insurers need to unlock the mass-timber revolution
Judith Schultz, fire safety engineering lead at Arup, tackles what insurers need to know about mass-timber risks.
Consumer Duty fails to improve insurance customer’s experiences
Most general insurance customers have seen zero improvement in service from general insurance providers since the implementation of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Consumer Duty a year ago, with some even saying things have gotten worse, research has revealed.
Van and moped crash-for-cash schemes on the rise
Crash-for-cash schemes involving vans and mopeds are on the rise and moving into urban areas outside of London, according to Ageas.
Small changes could make a big difference with BI insurance
Trade Voice: Aruna Chandrapalan, chair of the Chartered Institute of Loss Adjusters’ business interruption special interest group and head of forensic accounting services for Asia at Sedgwick, looks at how uncertainty around BI cover might be dispelled.
Which? demands FCA action over ‘widespread’ claims-handling failures
Consumer champion Which? has launched a new campaign to end “the insurance rip-off” and has called on the Financial Conduct Authority to take tough action against claims handlers who fall short of the regulator’s required standards.