Axa denies complicity after Accident Exchange exhumes Autofocus cases
Credit hire operator Accident Exchange is set on pursuing its legal challenge of cases involving evidence from now-defunct Autofocus that it exaggerated costs, after accusing Axa and its lawyers of complicity – a charge Axa denies.
The CHO has reached settlements with more than 50 insurers since December 2011 when it won appeals on four test cases where Autofocus evidence had been used by insurers to show credit hire rates
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@postonline.co.uk
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@postonline.co.uk
More on Claims
Forces set to reshape home insurance pricing into 2026
From climate impacts and subsidence surges to fraud trends, electric vehicle fire risks, regulation and artificial intelligence, Peter Farrelly, chief operating officer of Sedgwick, outlines the key forces set to shape home insurance pricing and development in 2026.
What Christmas movie cars teach us about windscreens today
As festive film viewing turns our minds to cinematic car icons, Auto Windscreens managing director James MacBeth assesses how the DeLorean, Kitt and James Bond’s Lotus would cope with modern windscreen demands.
Navigating the Arbitration Act 2025
Lydia Savill, partner of Hogan Lovells, outlines what the Arbitration Act 2025 means for insurers.
Diary of an Insurer: Charles Taylor Adjusting’s Matthew Calveley
Matthew Calveley, technical director (metallurgy) at Charles Taylor Adjusting, swaps the Monday morning school run for a flight to Turkey to get to grips with the technical aspects of a manufacturer's claim and moves on to a specialist recycling centre in Germany.
Why Which?’s super-complaint is a turning point for insurance
Rocio Concha, director of policy and advocacy at Which?, explains why the Financial Conduct Authority’s agreement with its super-complaint marks a critical moment for home and travel insurance, and why swift regulatory action is now essential to improve consumer outcomes.
JLR breach sparks debate on insurance gaps and state support
Joel Leigh, partner at law firm Howard Kennedy, examines how the £2bn Jaguar Land Rover breach triggered government intervention, supply-chain strain and potential disputes that underline the need for robust cyber cover.
Claims and Legal Forecast of 2026
The claims and legal sectors stand on the cusp of transformation as we hurtle towards 2026, facing policy reform, accelerating innovation and rising customer expectations in the year ahead.
How Covid-19 litigation has shifted BI policy wording
Joanna Grant, managing partner of Fenchurch Law, explores how business interruption insurance has evolved five years on from the pandemic, and whether the lessons of Covid-19 are being properly applied today.