Jackson's “grotesque” comment highlights the flaws in his own proposals for reform
Comments made by Lord Justice Jackson in his judgment in the Court of Appeal case of Pankhurst v. White, highlighted the fact that, if Jackson’s own proposals were adopted, solicitors would be entitled to deduct up to 25% of a claimant’s damages, according to DAS.
Lord Justice Jackson, has described the funding arrangements in a case which allowed the claimant’s solicitor to deduct costs from their client’s damages as “grotesque”.
Kathryn Mortimer, head of
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@postonline.co.uk
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@postonline.co.uk
More on Regulation
FOS believes it is still 'too soon' to judge Consumer Duty impact
It is too early to determine whether the Consumer Duty has reduced complaints about home and travel insurance, the Financial Ombudsman Service has told peers.
FCA pressed by Lords over regulating ChatGPT
The Financial Conduct Authority has been challenged by peers over whether artificial intelligence platforms such as ChatGPT should be brought within the regulator’s remit.
FCA looking to address issues on claims definitions
Andrew Ruddle, the Financial Conduct Authority’s interim head of the department for insurance market analysis and policy, has said the regulator is looking at addressing issues about different claims definitions within insurance.
Don’t hold your breath for an FCA rulebook on AI
The UK insurance sector is waiting for a Financial Conduct Authority rulebook on AI that is never coming, warns Loka Venkatramana, senior consultant at compliance consultancy Pathlight Associates.
Time:To – Sicsic reveals how insurers can keep the FCA happy
Michael Sicsic, managing partner of Sicsic Advisory, outlines three things it’s time to do to meet regulatory requirements in the latest Insurance Post Time To video.
Will the FCA’s non-financial misconduct rules change the City?
As the September deadline for the FCA’s non-financial misconduct rules approaches, Séamus O’Hanlon explores how insurers are adapting to the regulation and if it will make a difference.
Stop being hypocritical and give PCWs what they want
Deputy Editor’s View: Scott McGee argues that if insurers want aggregators to focus on more than just price, they should provide the claims data they’ve been asking for.
Why delegated oversight can no longer be housekeeping
Lloyd’s has embraced delegation at scale, but Richard Spencer, managing partner of New Link Consulting, argues governance and customer outcome monitoring have failed to keep pace.