Skip to main content

Case offers warning to brokers

Fisk v Brian Thornhill & Sons (Court of Appeal - 28 February 2007)

A producing broker (F) appealed against the dismissal of his Part 20 claim against a placing broker (T). F through T had arranged property insurance for the claimant owners of a public house. The insurance was expressly arranged on the basis that the property construction was brick, stone, slates and tiles. Notwithstanding the owners' incomplete answers on the proposal form, and the fact that the property was of wattle and daub construction, cover for one year commenced in October 2000.

Acting on instructions to renew the insurance, T proceeded to arrange cover with a new insurer from October 2001.

A copy of the quotation was not supplied to T or to the owners. Importantly, that quotation required a warranty that the property was brick, stone, slates and tiles. When the property was damaged by floods on 21 October 2001, insurers refused cover on the basis that the property was not of brick, stone, slates and tiles construction.

The court allowed F's Part 20 claim, concluding that T was in breach of the duty to the owners, in that T did not make it clear that they were intending to effect the new policy with a different insurer, who had different terms and conditions. Furthermore, T should have clarified the ambiguity in the information he received from the owners in the preceding year regarding the structure of the property.

COMMENT

On the facts, the court was prepared to accept that the placing broker owed a direct duty to the ultimate insured. Moreover it illustrates that, a broker must take caution in relying on information provided by the insured if the facts/circumstances put him on enquiry as to its accuracy. - Alexander Traill, BLM London

These law reports are contributed by national law firm Berrymans Lace Mawer (www.blm-law.com).

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

Storm damage claims test insurers’ settlement choices

A year of severe storms has strained repair networks and claims operations, which Ben Blain, head of property at Verisk Claims, points out has placed insurers’ settlement decisions, data oversight and ability to evidence fair customer outcomes firmly under the regulatory spotlight.

Why AI should never make insurance claims decisions

As the mass roll-out of artificial intelligence in insurance continues at break neck speed, Ross Sinclair, founder and CEO at embedded insurance technology provider EIP, discusses one area of insurance that AI needs to be kept away from: claims decisions.

Managing the ‘forever risk’ of PFAS

How PFAS, often called “forever chemicals”, is creating one of the most complex and far-reaching environmental risks for insurers today is the topic of the latest Insurance Post Podcast.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here