Skip to main content

Trunk and disorderly

The insurance industry has been made a scapegoat for the indiscriminate uprooting of London trees for subsidence issues, writes Jakki May. In actual fact, the majority of trees removed are due to health and safety issues and insurers have developed strict protocols before making a final decision

The 20th anniversary of the great storm, which tore a path of destruction through the UK on the night of 15 October 1987, has highlighted the resulting devastation with many photographs from the time

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Post? View our subscription options

Storm damage claims test insurers’ settlement choices

A year of severe storms has strained repair networks and claims operations, which Ben Blain, head of property at Verisk Claims, points out has placed insurers’ settlement decisions, data oversight and ability to evidence fair customer outcomes firmly under the regulatory spotlight.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here