Appeal court affirms Hillsborough secondary victim claim ruling
The Court of Appeal has revisited a 1992 Hillsborough ruling concerning secondary victims of psychiatric injury and re-affirmed that existing limitations should be applied unless Parliament intervenes, in a move that spells good news for insurers.
In the case of in Taylor v Novo, which concluded this week, lawyers for the claimant, Crystal Taylor, argued she had sustained psychiatric injury from witnessing her mother's sudden death three weeks
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@postonline.co.uk
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@postonline.co.uk
Most read
- RSA ‘pragmatic’ on product review as NIG acquisition completes
- Direct Line Group confirms Milliner amid raft of leadership hires
- Wakam looking to exploit ‘unlimited UK potential’ following regulator approval