Solvency II a “bigger risk than hurricanes”

European and British flags

The implementation of Solvency II is considered a bigger risk to the insurance industry than hurricanes, new research has found.

According to a study compiled by IT consultancy Northdoor, 58% of insurers believe that the incoming European solvency regulation is more of a risk to insurers than a natural catastrophe.

The research also revealed that 26% believe that the industry is behind with its Solvency II compliance, while 13% claimed that they had already spent between £250 000 and £500 000 on the regulation. An additional 6% expect to spend at least £1m more.

Commenting on the findings, Rob Stavrou, director of consultancy at Northdoor, said: "The fact that the industry sees Solvency II as on a par with hurricane season shows that this really is the burning issue in the market right now!

"Companies have made good progress - but there is still more to do - and it's worrying that nearly 75% of respondents didn't know or weren't sure whether the industry was really on track with compliance.

He added: "Solvency II requires a focus on three key areas - data, processes and technology - and companies really need to keep that in mind as they move forward with their progress towards compliance."

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@postonline.co.uk or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.postonline.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@postonline.co.uk to find out more.

How to support insurance customers in vulnerable circumstances

As the Financial Conduct Authority intends to check claims-handling response times, and whether insurers are doing enough to help customers in vulnerable circumstances, Winn Group chief information officer Clint Milnes explains what providers need to do to meet the watchdog’s expectations.

What happens now on the OIC landscape post-Rabot?

After the Supreme Court rejected the insurer-led appeal against its decision on the first two cases of mixed-injury claims involving both whiplash and non-whiplash injuries, the Association of Consumer Support Organisations’ director Matthew Maxwell Scott asks: What's next?

What the future holds for AI regulation

Striking the right balance between regulatory intervention and industry autonomy is crucial to realising the full benefits of artificial intelligence while ensuring ethical, accountable, and inclusive practices within the insurance sector, argues Nutan Rajguru, Verisk UK's head of analytics.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Post account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here